I agree with that and the next reply but currently they are not limited to one sub.
@7asid is technically right.
So @Faintbrush can rule on us anything he wants.
My opinion about sub number: ( to explain myself why not to feel morally bad by it)
Not limiting subs number encourages making more music.
You wrote really nice reasons for limitation…
I have nothing to add.
In practice as i see it: having more subs-more chance to win.
If the author would make for example 5 profiles on IDMF and post the tracks under different names, would that be unfair? Why?
Is there any money involved in this? Did mfxxx get 2.34 billion atoms of oxygen more to breath because he made many subs and won with them?
If there was an reward greater than a chance to appear in BB comp album everyone would be rushing tons of tracks.
They would not because money is not such an inspiration? Put out that one great track and they would be overshadowed by track rushers?
In the case of mfxxx, did he won because he provided multiple musical opinions and would he lost if he would pick out a single track? So did he win unfairly?
…
I think it was nice that he made many tracks and i hope that the voters voted morally right, according to the fact that many subs mean more input from the same person.
I think people are able to see one person 'flooded the entry pool and adjust their voting so that is fair…
And making more subs gives the bbattles more material so bb compilations can be a bit better.
I will submit one track, others are still there to listen. And voting is subjective.
[ Submitting °2 ]
That is really really nice. Thank you.
But if i can submit 2 then anyone else can!
That is it for now. Have a nice part of the day you are in and as many more of them as you wish.