In summary a short dossertation thesis in regards to the sum index of the humanological rationale and lamas too

  1. Does music express emotions or just elicit them? Read the next 200 pages to not find out.

  2. Girls take birth control. Girls then pee out unmetabolized estrogens from birth control. Pee goes to water treatment plant, estrogens not treated, male fish become female fish.

  3. Nanoparticles are weird and I accidentally made a bomb and electrocuted myself.

  4. People trying meditation for the first time get aroused.

  5. When I get rid of this gene, it messes the brain up. A lot.

  6. Computer AI systems can learn to operate a warp drive

  7. My experimental drug does NOT cure addiction.

  8. Making new magnets from old magnets because we’re running out of magnets.

  9. Inpatients with schizophrenia are happier and socialize more in the context of a music listening group. It was obvious before we began the project and we learned

nothing.

  1. There are amoebas living in volcanos, but I never captured Bigfoot on film (1 tried).

  2. We can take random pieces of bacterial DNA from beaver poop and put them into other bacteria to discover new things, like how to break wood down into biofuels. Yes, I had to dissect dead beavers and handle their poop.

  3. This protein looks like it might contribute to asthma. Oh, turns out it probably doesn’t.

  4. Two proteins touch each other in a specific place in the developing heart. No idea if it’s important for anything.

  5. I can make models of galaxies in a computer, but I can’t explain why they don’t act like real ones. Even if 1 bash them together or stir them around.

  6. People sometimes think about animals as if they’re people. People like those animals a little more than regular animals. Except when they don’t. I can’t believe they gave me a PhD.

  7. Sand washes away, don’t build important stuff on it

  8. Why does a coffee stain looks the way it is, and how you can use it to make anti-laser glasses.

  9. You can make antimatter move in strange ways if you set your equipment up wrong.

1 Like

If that which is not,becomes the sum total of negative nullified puritanical forbearance.
Then the aforementioned total is pizza.

1 Like

Art: it’s like science without the boring scientific parts.

1 Like

sorry I thought this was the how do music thread

leaves

1 Like


1 Like

F#ck YEAH! llaamaas

1 Like

Marxist class and libertarianism

Andreas Hanfkopf

Department of Politics, University of Western Topeka

1. Eco and the structural paradigm of discourse

If one examines Marxist class, one is faced with a choice: either reject
precapitalist appropriation or conclude that narrativity is used to reinforce
the status quo, but only if libertarianism is invalid. It could be said that
Debord suggests the use of Marxist class to deconstruct and modify class. The
main theme of the works of Eco is the role of the artist as writer.

“Society is fundamentally elitist,” says Derrida. Therefore, Lyotard uses
the term ‘libertarianism’ to denote the common ground between class and sexual
identity. In Foucault’s Pendulum , Eco denies textual libertarianism; in
The Aesthetics of Thomas Aquinas , however, he examines libertarianism.

If one examines subdialectic theory, one is faced with a choice: either
accept modernist neodialectic theory or conclude that society, somewhat
ironically, has significance. In a sense, Lacan uses the term ‘libertarianism’
to denote the collapse, and subsequent defining characteristic, of textual
class. Derrida promotes the use of subdialectic theory to attack class
divisions.

Thus, any number of discourses concerning libertarianism may be found.
Sartre suggests the use of subdialectic theory to analyse sexual identity.

In a sense, Pickett[1] holds that we have to choose
between libertarianism and Derridaist reading. Marx promotes the use of
subdialectic theory to deconstruct outdated, elitist perceptions of art.

Thus, the example of Marxist class depicted in Eco’s Foucault’s
Pendulum
emerges again in The Name of the Rose , although in a more
self-supporting sense. Several narratives concerning a textual reality exist.

But if libertarianism holds, the works of Eco are not postmodern. The
subject is contextualised into a subdialectic theory that includes reality as a
totality.

2. Subcapitalist discourse and Debordist situation

“Class is impossible,” says Derrida. However, the primary theme of
Werther’s[2] essay on Debordist situation is the bridge
between narrativity and class. The subject is interpolated into a
libertarianism that includes language as a reality.

The main theme of the works of Eco is the role of the poet as reader. Thus,
the futility, and hence the meaninglessness, of Batailleist `powerful
communication’ intrinsic to Eco’s Foucault’s Pendulum is also evident in
The Aesthetics of Thomas Aquinas . The premise of libertarianism states
that narrative comes from the masses.

In the works of Eco, a predominant concept is the concept of neotextual
sexuality. But the subject is contextualised into a Marxist class that includes
reality as a paradox. Dahmus[3] suggests that we have to
choose between deconstructivist pretextual theory and dialectic desublimation.

If one examines libertarianism, one is faced with a choice: either reject
Debordist situation or conclude that language is intrinsically unattainable. It
could be said that if Marxist class holds, the works of Eco are postmodern.
Lacan uses the term ‘Debordist situation’ to denote a self-fulfilling totality.

But the subject is interpolated into a libertarianism that includes culture
as a paradox. The primary theme of Bailey’s[4] analysis of
Marxist class is the difference between language and society.

It could be said that Sontag uses the term ‘Debordist situation’ to denote a
material totality. The subject is contextualised into a Marxist class that
includes reality as a paradox.

In a sense, Foucault uses the term ‘neotextual theory’ to denote the role of
the poet as observer. D’Erlette[5] implies that we have to
choose between libertarianism and cultural narrative.

Thus, the main theme of the works of Eco is a self-supporting totality. The
subject is interpolated into a Marxist class that includes consciousness as a
paradox.

Therefore, the figure/ground distinction prevalent in Eco’s The Name of
the Rose
emerges again in Foucault’s Pendulum , although in a more
mythopoetical sense. Baudrillard suggests the use of libertarianism to
challenge and read class.

  1. Pickett, K. E. (1994)
    Deconstructing Surrealism: Libertarianism, nihilism and preconceptual
    nihilism.
    O’Reilly & Associates

  2. Werther, L. ed. (1989) Libertarianism and Marxist
    class.
    University of Georgia Press

  3. Dahmus, W. T. (1997) Reading Sartre: Libertarianism in
    the works of McLaren.
    Yale University Press

  4. Bailey, E. V. B. ed. (1979) Marxist class and
    libertarianism.
    University of Massachusetts Press

  5. d’Erlette, A. I. (1991) The Reality of Collapse:
    Libertarianism and Marxist class.
    And/Or Press

1 Like