[:] Human mind as a biocomputer [:] - Page 2
You are Unregistered, please register to gain Full access.    

The Side Room Off topic chat about pretty much anything other than music. Try to be respectful. Strong debate is welcomed, insults and trolling are not. This area is for over 18's only and may occasionally contain NSFW material, although it's not encouraged.

Thread Tools
Old 16-07-2014, 09:54 PM   #21
Generate & Test
Cypherclerk is a savage MCCypherclerk is a savage MCCypherclerk is a savage MCCypherclerk is a savage MCCypherclerk is a savage MCCypherclerk is a savage MCCypherclerk is a savage MCCypherclerk is a savage MCCypherclerk is a savage MCCypherclerk is a savage MCCypherclerk is a savage MC
Cypherclerk's Avatar
Rectilinear Filigree
Posts: 5,214
MC Status: 53741005
Thanks: 2,227
Thanked 2,388 Times in 1,627 Posts
Re: Human mind as a biocomputer

Daniel Dennett - Consciousness Explained

Content visible to registered users only.
"The book puts forward a "multiple drafts" model of consciousness, suggesting that there is no single central place (a "Cartesian Theater") where conscious experience occurs; instead there are "various events of content-fixation occurring in various places at various times in the brain".[1] The brain consists of a "bundle of semi-independent agencies";[2] when "content-fixation" takes place in one of these, its effects may propagate so that it leads to the utterance of one of the sentences that make up the story in which the central character is one's "self". Dennett's view of consciousness is that it is the apparently serial account for the brain's underlying parallelism.

One of the book's more controversial claims is that qualia do not (and cannot) exist. Dennett's main argument is that the various properties attributed to qualia by philosophers—qualia are supposed to be incorrigible, ineffable, private, directly accessible and so on—are incompatible, so the notion of qualia is incoherent. The non-existence of qualia would mean that there is no hard problem of consciousness, and "philosophical zombies", which are supposed to act like a human in every way while somehow lacking qualia, cannot exist. So, as Dennett wryly notes, he is committed to the belief that we are all p-zombies (if you define the term p-zombie as functionally identical to a human being without any additional non material aspects)—adding that his remark is very much open to misinterpretation.[3]

Dennett claims that our brains hold only a few salient details about the world, and that this is the only reason we are able to function at all. Thus, we don't store elaborate pictures in short-term memory, as this is not necessary and would consume valuable computing power. Rather, we log what has changed and assume the rest has stayed the same, with the result that we miss some details, as demonstrated in various experiments and illusions, some of which Dennett outlines.[4][5] Research subsequent to Dennett's book indicates that some of his postulations were more conservative than expected. A year after Consciousness Explained was published, Dennett noted "I wish in retrospect that I'd been more daring, since the effects are stronger than I claimed". And since then examples continue to accumulate of the illusory nature of our visual world.[6]

A key philosophical method is heterophenomenology, in which the verbal or written reports of subjects are treated as akin to a theorist's fiction—the subject's report is not questioned, but it is not assumed to be an incorrigible report about that subject's inner state. This approach allows the reports of the subject to be a datum in psychological research, thus circumventing the limits of classical behaviorism.

Also Dennett says that only a theory that explained conscious events in terms of unconscious events could explain consciousness at all: «To explain is to explain away»."


If you have 21 years to re-read one book several times and not remember any of the content, this is the one.


Cypherclerk is offline   Thanks Reply With Quote
Thanks to Cypherclerk
PROton42 (16-07-2014)
Old 06-12-2016, 07:00 AM   #22
TOO on fleek
an10na is a savage MCan10na is a savage MCan10na is a savage MCan10na is a savage MCan10na is a savage MCan10na is a savage MCan10na is a savage MCan10na is a savage MCan10na is a savage MCan10na is a savage MCan10na is a savage MC
an10na's Avatar
Skyway Patrol
Posts: 459
MC Status: 10010
Thanks: 184
Thanked 200 Times in 149 Posts
Re: [:] Human mind as a biocomputer [:]

computer god containment policy!


an10na is offline   Thanks Reply With Quote

Thread Tools

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
This about sums up being human Triton64 The Side Room 35 25-10-2013 06:03 AM
The anti-human thread. Thomas The Side Room 10 18-09-2012 07:07 AM

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:25 AM.

Electronic Music Forums

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.